ANSYS Benchmark #7: Results List

Large Model Test

Simulation Details: A bolt holds 2 plates together with contact [friction] used between all parts. After preload is established, a fixed displacement is applied to one plate forcing it to slide relative to the other plate until the bolt hole clearance is closed.

Enter Your Results| Benchmark Index |

Index Computer
Mfr.		 Processor
Sockets		 Processor
Cores		 ANSYS
Version		 OS Wall Time
(Hrs)		 CPU Time
(Hrs) 		Notes
1. 
Lenovo D20
2
2
12.0
Vista 64
 2.10
 3.98
2x Xeon X5570 @ 2.93 GHz, 118 total iterations, -np=2, -m=4000, OS Performance Settings set to "Best Performance" - RA 10/2009
2. 
Lenovo D20
2
2
12.0
Vista 64
 2.34
 4.43
2x Xeon X5570 @ 2.93 GHz, 135 total iterations, -np=2, -m=4000, RA 10/2009 This ran slightly faster than V11 SP1 (below), but also has 8 fewer iterations. I wish we had the ability to use more cores than the 2 that come with the standard license!
3. 
PADT
2
8
11.0
Suse
 2.40
 12.21
2x Xeon 3.2Ghz Santa Rosa, 1600MHz FSB (test chips), 16Gb RAM, pcg solver, Suse (2.6.18.8-0.7-default-smp), 106 iterations total, -np8 -lm -m 20000 -db 4000
4. 
Lenovo D20
2
2
11.0
Vista 64
 2.59
 4.92
2x Xeon X5570 @ 2.93 GHz, 146 total iterations, -np=2, -m=4000, RA 7/2009
5. 
HP Xw8600
2
8
11.0
Suse
 3.13
 11.28
2x Xeon E5440 2.0GHz 6Mb L2 Cache, 64Gb RAM, pcg solver, Suse (2.6.18.8-0.7-default-smp), 144 iterations total, -np8 -lm -m 20000 -db 4000
6. 
HP Xw8600
2
8
11.0
Suse
 3.32
 11.91
2x Xeon E5440 2.0GHz 6Mb L2 Cache, 64Gb RAM, sparse solver, Suse (2.6.18.8-0.7-default-smp), 155 iterations total, -np8 -lm -m 20000 -db 4000
7. 
Dell Precision 690
2
2
11.0
XP64
 3.53
 9.50
DualXEON-2Ghz,16GB Ram. PCG 1bisection.
8. 
PADT
2
8
11.0
Suse
 3.55
 13.57
2x Xeon 3220, 32Gb RAM, sparse solver, Suse 9 (2.6.18.8-0.01-default-smp), 129 iterations total, -np8 -lm -m 20000 -db 4000
9. 
PADT
1
4
11.0
x64
 3.74
 10.50
Core 2 Quad, Q6600, 8Gb RAM, pcg solver, x64, 139 iterations total, -np4 -m 6000 -db 1000, RocketRaid 2310 w/ 2x 150Gb Raptors
10. 
Lenovo S10
1
2
11.0
Vistax64
 3.82
 7.26
Core 2 Duo E6850 - 3 GHz, 140 total iterations, pcg solver, -m 5000, -db 1000, System cost ~$3600 in 11/2008, RA 6/2009
11. 
PADT
2
8
11.0
Suse
 3.88
 20.10
2x Xeon 3220, 32Gb RAM, pcg solver, Suse 9 (2.6.18.8-0.01-default-smp), 129 iterations total, -np8 -lm -m 20000 -db 4000
12. 
PADT
2
4
11.0
Suse
 3.90
 9.77
2x Xeon 5148 2.33GHz 4Mb L2 Cache, 8Gb RAM, sparse solver, Suse (2.6.18.8-0.3-default-smp), 122 iterations total, -np4 -m 20000 -db 4000
13. 
Dell PWS490
2
2
11.0
XP 64
 4.03
 7.73
Run in batch mode on Dell WPS 490, CPU is Intel Xeon 5150 at 2.66GHz, 16GB of RAM. Excecution parameters: -b -m 8000 -db 1024 -np 2. Solution with 124 subiterations.
14. 
Custom made
2
2
11.0
W2003x64
 4.04
 7.82
Tyan Thunder H2000M, 32 GB (16x2 GB), 2x Opteron 2222, 2x 300GB SAS 15000 RPM as RAID 0, 119 iterations total, PCG Solver, ANSYS 11.0 linked against AMD ACML library instead of Intel MKL
15. 
PADT
1
4
11.0
x64
 4.05
 10.65
Core 2 Quad, Q6600, 8Gb RAM, sparse solver, x64, 136 iterations total, -np4 -m 6000 -db 1000, RocketRaid 2310 w/ 2x 150Gb Raptors
16. 
Dell Precision 490
2
2
11.0
XP 64
 4.06
 7.76
Run from product launcher in batch. SMP used with 2 processors, -m 10000, -db 50, 126 total iterations. 2x Xeon 5150 2.66 GHz, 16 Gb DDR2 667 MHz, SAS 10000 rpm HDD.
17. 
HP Xw8600
2
8
11.0
Suse
 4.15
 20.88
2x Xeon E5440 2.0GHz 6Mb L2 Cache, 64Gb RAM, pcg solver, Suse (2.6.18.8-0.7-default-smp), 151 iterations total, -np8 -lm -m 20000 -db 4000
18. 
PADT
2
4
11.0
Suse
 4.27
 11.80
2x Xeon 5148 2.33GHz 4Mb L2 Cache, 8Gb RAM, pcg solver, Suse (2.6.18.8-0.3-default-smp), 147 iterations total, -np4 -m 20000 -db 4000
19. 
Opteron 2218 on Tyan S2927
2
4
10.0
XP-64
 4.31
 14.74
I did not run it in batch mode. I just read in the bench07.mac. File->Read Input From -> bench07.mac
20. 
Custom made
2
2
11.0
W2003x64
 4.78
 9.15
Tyan Thunder H2000M, 32 GB (16x2 GB), 2x Opteron 2222, 2x 300GB SAS 15000 RPM as RAID 0, 140 Iterations total, PCG Solver
21. 
HP XW8600
2
8
11.0
XP 64
 5.43
 10.44
2x Xeon E5440 @2.83 GHz, 6GB RAM, 149 iterations, pcg solver, 149 iterations, SMP used with 2 processors, -m 4000 -db 1000
22. 
PADT
2
2
10.0
SuSE 9.3
 7.24
 14.43
2x Opteron 248, 2.8Gb RAM, /config,nproc,2, pcg solver, Suse 9.3 (2.6.11.4-21.9-smp), Tyan S2875, onboard Raid 0 w/ 2x WD1200JD, 138 iterations total
23. 
SGI ALTIX 350
1
1
11.0
SLES 10
 7.70
 7.69
Batch-mode, Standard run, 1xItanium2 (1.5 GHz, 6 MB cache)
24. 
PADT
2
2
11.0
SuSE 9.3
 8.01
 7.99
2x Opteron 248, 2.8Mb RAM, -np 2 -m 5000 -db 100, pcg solver, Suse 9.3 (2.6.11.4-21.9-smp), Tyan S2875, onboard Raid 0 w/ 2x WD1200JD
25. 
HP XW8200
2
2
11.0
XP 32
 8.77
 16.11
3600 MHz processors, 4GB RAM. Default solve settings
26. 
Dell Precision 370
1
1
10.0
XP SP2
 9.50
 8.60
P4 3.6GHz 2Gb RAM 2 x 74GB WD 10K SATA HDD Default benchmark (PCG)
27. 
HP XW 8200
2
1
10.0
XP64
 10.20
 9.70
standard settings for solver etc. from input file with medium load for rest of system (harddisk etc.)
28. 
HP C8000
4
1
11.0
HP UX 11
 10.26
 10.24
-m 16000, -db 1600, 1 bisect, CUM Iter 133, Ansys 11.0 (not SP1)
29. 
PADT
2
2
10.0
SuSE 9.3
 10.49
 10.48
2x Opteron 248, 2.8Gb RAM, -np 2, local distributed pcg solver, Suse 9.3 (2.6.11.4-21.9-smp), Tyan S2875, onboard Raid 0 w/ 2x WD1200JD, 121 iterations total
30. 
Dell Precision 470
1
1
10.0
RHEL 3
 13.70
 12.96
3.2 GHz Xeon EMT64, 4Gb RAM, 1x10Krpm SATA, 1x 7.2Krpm SATA, RH Enterprise Linux WS-3 64Bit. Default benchmark (PCG)
31. 
HP C530
1
1
11.0
XP-32
 16.20
 14.70
P4-3ghz. 4gb ram. 3 bi-sections. Abrupt contact status.
32. 
HP XW8200
2
1
11.0
XP 32
 17.18
 16.64
3600 MHz processors, 4GB RAM. Default solve settings
33. 
HP Proliant ML310
1
1
10.0
Windows
17.83
 9.28
Pentium P4, 2.8Ghz, 2.5Gb RAM
    © Copyright 1994-2010 Phoenix Analysis & Design Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. :: 480.813.4884

Home | Contact Us | Site Map | Search | www.padtmedical.com

Products & Sales
Engineering Services
Rapid Manufacturing
Product Development
Support & Training
About PADT