ANSYS Benchmark #7: Results List

Large Model Test

Simulation Details: A bolt holds 2 plates together with contact [friction] used between all parts. After preload is established, a fixed displacement is applied to one plate forcing it to slide relative to the other plate until the bolt hole clearance is closed.

Enter Your Results| Benchmark Index |

Index Computer
Mfr.		 Processor
Sockets		 Processor
Cores		 ANSYS
Version		 OS Wall Time
(Hrs)		 CPU Time
(Hrs) 		Notes
1. 
PADT CUBE HVPC
2
2
13.0 SP2
Win 7x64
 1.386
 2.567
GPU: 2x Intel Xeon x5690 @3.47GHz, 144GB RAM, 124 total iterations, GPU Solve Option Only Quadro 6000, DRJM 11/9/2011
2. 
PADT CUBE HVPC
2
2
13.0 SP2
Win 7x64
 1.523
 2.821
2x Intel Xeon x5690 @3.47GHz, 144GB RAM, 135 total iterations, -np=2, GPU Assist Option w/SMP, Nvidia Quadro 6000, LANB, SPAR, DRJM 11/8/2011
3. 
Dell Precision T5500
1
4
13.0
Vista 64
 1.699
 6.073
Intel Xeon E5520 @ 2.6GHz, 12GB RAM, 124 total iterations. -np=4 RS 10/6/2011
4. 
PADT CUBE HVPC
2
2
13.0 SP2
Win 7x64
 1.711
 3.270
2x Intel Xeon x5690 @3.47GHz, 144GB RAM, 124 total iterations, -np=2, LANB, SPAR, DRJM 11/7/2011
5. 
KRONOS S900
2
2
13.0
Win 7x64
 1.760
 3.350
2x Intel Xeon x5690 (overclocked) @ 4.37GHz, 48GB RAM, 151 total iterations,-np=2, PCG, JJ 10/26/2011
6. 
PADT CUBE HVPC
2
4
13.0 SP2
Linux 64
 1.830
 6.596
2x Intel Xeon x5560 @ 2.83GHz, 32GB RAM, 144 total iterations, -np=4,SMP, DRJM 10/4/2011
7. 
PADT CUBE HVPC
2
2
13.0 SP2
Linux 64
 2.006
 3.788
2x Intel Xeon x5560 @ 2.83GHz, 32GB RAM, 125 total iterations, -np=2, SMP, DRJM 10/4/2011
8. 
Dell Precision T3500
1
6
12.1
Win 7x64
 2.071
 3.735
Intel Xeon 6 cores, Samsung SSD PM800 2.5” 238 GB -RDB 9/22/2010
9. 
Lenovo D20
2
2
12.0
Vista 64
 2.100
 3.980
2x Xeon X5570 @ 2.93 GHz, 118 total iterations, -np=2, -m=4000, OS Performance Settings set to "Best Performance" - RA 10/2009
10. 
Dell Precision T5500
1
4
13.0
Vista 64
 2.138
 4.028
Intel Xeon E5520 @ 2.6GHz, 12GB RAM, 124 total iterations. RS 10/4/2011
11. 
Lenovo D20
2
2
12.0
Vista 64
 2.340
 4.430
2x Xeon X5570 @ 2.93 GHz, 135 total iterations, -np=2, -m=4000, RA 10/2009 This ran slightly faster than V11 SP1 (below), but also has 8 fewer iterations. I wish we had the ability to use more cores than the 2 that come with the standard license!
12. 
PADT
2
8
11.0
Suse
 2.397
 12.211
2x Xeon 3.2Ghz Santa Rosa, 1600MHz FSB (test chips), 16Gb RAM, pcg solver, Suse (2.6.18.8-0.7-default-smp), 106 iterations total, -np8 -lm -m 20000 -db 4000
13. 
Lenovo D20
2
2
11.0
Vista 64
 2.590
 4.920
2x Xeon X5570 @ 2.93 GHz, 146 total iterations, -np=2, -m=4000, RA 7/2009
14. 
PADT CUBE HVPC
2
6
13.0 SP2
Linux 64
 2.850
 2.855
2x Intel Xeon E5504 @ 2.0GHz, 16GB RAM, 134 total iterations, -np=6, MPP, DRJM 10/10/2011
15. 
HP Xw8600
2
8
11.0
Suse
 3.131
 11.279
2x Xeon E5440 2.0GHz 6Mb L2 Cache, 64Gb RAM, pcg solver, Suse (2.6.18.8-0.7-default-smp), 144 iterations total, -np8 -lm -m 20000 -db 4000
16. 
HP Xw8600
2
8
11.0
Suse
 3.324
 11.913
2x Xeon E5440 2.0GHz 6Mb L2 Cache, 64Gb RAM, sparse solver, Suse (2.6.18.8-0.7-default-smp), 155 iterations total, -np8 -lm -m 20000 -db 4000
17. 
Dell Precision M6500
2
8
13.0
XP SP3
 3.415
 5.884
2x Intel i7 720QM Processor @ 1.6 GHz, 111 Total Iterations – RA 3/31/2011
18. 
Dell Precision 690
2
2
11.0
XP64
 3.530
 9.500
DualXEON-2Ghz,16GB Ram. PCG 1bisection.
19. 
PADT
2
8
11.0
Suse
 3.554
 13.574
2x Xeon 3220, 32Gb RAM, sparse solver, Suse 9 (2.6.18.8-0.01-default-smp), 129 iterations total, -np8 -lm -m 20000 -db 4000
20. 
PADT
1
4
11.0
x64
 3.740
 10.504
Core 2 Quad, Q6600, 8Gb RAM, pcg solver, x64, 139 iterations total, -np4 -m 6000 -db 1000, RocketRaid 2310 w/ 2x 150Gb Raptors
21. 
Lenovo S10
1
2
11.0
Vistax64
 3.820
 7.260
Core 2 Duo E6850 - 3 GHz, 140 total iterations, pcg solver, -m 5000, -db 1000, System cost ~$3600 in 11/2008, RA 6/2009
22. 
PADT
2
8
11.0
Suse
 3.879
 20.102
2x Xeon 3220, 32Gb RAM, pcg solver, Suse 9 (2.6.18.8-0.01-default-smp), 129 iterations total, -np8 -lm -m 20000 -db 4000
23. 
PADT
2
4
11.0
Suse
 3.898
 9.768
2x Xeon 5148 2.33GHz 4Mb L2 Cache, 8Gb RAM, sparse solver, Suse (2.6.18.8-0.3-default-smp), 122 iterations total, -np4 -m 20000 -db 4000
24. 
Dell PWS490
2
2
11.0
XP 64
 4.030
 7.730
Run in batch mode on Dell WPS 490, CPU is Intel Xeon 5150 at 2.66GHz, 16GB of RAM. Excecution parameters: -b -m 8000 -db 1024 -np 2. Solution with 124 subiterations.
25. 
Custom made
2
2
11.0
W2003x64
 4.040
 7.820
Tyan Thunder H2000M, 32 GB (16x2 GB), 2x Opteron 2222, 2x 300GB SAS 15000 RPM as RAID 0, 119 iterations total, PCG Solver, ANSYS 11.0 linked against AMD ACML library instead of Intel MKL
26. 
PADT
1
4
11.0
x64
 4.051
 10.649
Core 2 Quad, Q6600, 8Gb RAM, sparse solver, x64, 136 iterations total, -np4 -m 6000 -db 1000, RocketRaid 2310 w/ 2x 150Gb Raptors
27. 
Dell Precision 490
2
2
11.0
XP 64
 4.060
 7.760
Run from product launcher in batch. SMP used with 2 processors, -m 10000, -db 50, 126 total iterations. 2x Xeon 5150 2.66 GHz, 16 Gb DDR2 667 MHz, SAS 10000 rpm HDD.
28. 
HP Xw8600
2
8
11.0
Suse
 4.150
 20.884
2x Xeon E5440 2.0GHz 6Mb L2 Cache, 64Gb RAM, pcg solver, Suse (2.6.18.8-0.7-default-smp), 151 iterations total, -np8 -lm -m 20000 -db 4000
29. 
PADT
2
4
11.0
Suse
 4.269
 11.802
2x Xeon 5148 2.33GHz 4Mb L2 Cache, 8Gb RAM, pcg solver, Suse (2.6.18.8-0.3-default-smp), 147 iterations total, -np4 -m 20000 -db 4000
30. 
PADT CUBE HVPC
2
6
13.0 SP2
Linux 64
 4.284
 22.637
2x Intel Xeon x5560 @ 2.83GHz, 32GB RAM, 358 total iterations, -np=6, SMP, DRJM 10/4/2011
31. 
Opteron 2218 on Tyan S2927
2
4
10.0
XP-64
 4.310
 14.740
I did not run it in batch mode. I just read in the bench07.mac. File->Read Input From -> bench07.mac
32. 
Custom made
2
2
11.0
W2003x64
 4.780
 9.150
Tyan Thunder H2000M, 32 GB (16x2 GB), 2x Opteron 2222, 2x 300GB SAS 15000 RPM as RAID 0, 140 Iterations total, PCG Solver
33. 
PADT CUBE HVPC
2
8
13.0 SP2
Linux 64
 5.187
 36.404
2x Intel Xeon x5560 @ 2.83GHz, 32GB RAM, 420 total iterations, -np=8, SMP, DRJM 10/4/2011
34. 
HP XW8600
2
8
11.0
XP 64
 5.430
 10.440
2x Xeon E5440 @2.83 GHz, 6GB RAM, 149 iterations, pcg solver, 149 iterations, SMP used with 2 processors, -m 4000 -db 1000
35. 
PADT
2
2
10.0
SuSE 9.3
 7.241
 14.425
2x Opteron 248, 2.8Gb RAM, /config,nproc,2, pcg solver, Suse 9.3 (2.6.11.4-21.9-smp), Tyan S2875, onboard Raid 0 w/ 2x WD1200JD, 138 iterations total
36. 
SGI ALTIX 350
1
1
11.0
SLES 10
 7.700
 7.690
Batch-mode, Standard run, 1xItanium2 (1.5 GHz, 6 MB cache)
37. 
PADT
2
2
11.0
SuSE 9.3
 8.008
 7.993
2x Opteron 248, 2.8Mb RAM, -np 2 -m 5000 -db 100, pcg solver, Suse 9.3 (2.6.11.4-21.9-smp), Tyan S2875, onboard Raid 0 w/ 2x WD1200JD
38. 
HP XW8200
2
2
11.0
XP 32
 8.770
 16.110
3600 MHz processors, 4GB RAM. Default solve settings
39. 
Dell Precision 370
1
1
10.0
XP SP2
 9.500
 8.600
P4 3.6GHz 2Gb RAM 2 x 74GB WD 10K SATA HDD Default benchmark (PCG)
40. 
HP XW 8200
2
1
10.0
XP64
 10.200
 9.700
standard settings for solver etc. from input file with medium load for rest of system (harddisk etc.)
41. 
HP C8000
4
1
11.0
HP UX 11
 10.260
 10.240
-m 16000, -db 1600, 1 bisect, CUM Iter 133, Ansys 11.0 (not SP1)
42. 
PADT
2
2
10.0
SuSE 9.3
 10.490
 10.483
2x Opteron 248, 2.8Gb RAM, -np 2, local distributed pcg solver, Suse 9.3 (2.6.11.4-21.9-smp), Tyan S2875, onboard Raid 0 w/ 2x WD1200JD, 121 iterations total
43. 
Dell Precision 470
1
1
10.0
RHEL 3
 13.700
 12.960
3.2 GHz Xeon EMT64, 4Gb RAM, 1x10Krpm SATA, 1x 7.2Krpm SATA, RH Enterprise Linux WS-3 64Bit. Default benchmark (PCG)
44. 
HP C530
1
1
11.0
XP-32
 16.200
 14.700
P4-3ghz. 4gb ram. 3 bi-sections. Abrupt contact status.
45. 
HP XW8200
2
1
11.0
XP 32
 17.180
 16.640
3600 MHz processors, 4GB RAM. Default solve settings
46. 
HP Proliant ML310
1
1
10.0
Windows
17.833
 9.275
Pentium P4, 2.8Ghz, 2.5Gb RAM
    © Copyright 1994-2012 Phoenix Analysis & Design Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. :: 480.813.4884

Home | Contact Us | Site Map | Search | www.padtmedical.com

Products & Sales
Engineering Services
Rapid Manufacturing
Product Development
Support & Training
About PADT