{"id":29378,"date":"2016-11-17T14:44:58","date_gmt":"2016-11-17T14:44:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.padtinc.com\/2016\/11\/17\/ansys-topological-optimization-sax\/"},"modified":"2022-03-24T22:50:41","modified_gmt":"2022-03-24T22:50:41","slug":"ansys-topological-optimization-sax","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.padtinc.com\/2016\/11\/17\/ansys-topological-optimization-sax\/","title":{"rendered":"ANSYS R17 Topological Optimization Application Example \u2013 Saxophone Brace"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"topo-opt-sax-a2\" <\/picture><\/a>What is Topological Optimization? If you\u2019re not familiar with the concept, in finite element terms it means performing a shape optimization utilizing mesh information to achieve a goal such as minimizing volume subject to certain loads and constraints. Unlike parameter optimization such as with ANSYS DesignXplorer, we are not varying geometry parameters. Rather, we\u2019re letting the program decide on an optimal shape based on the removal of material, accomplished by deactivating mesh elements. If the mesh is fine enough, we are left with an \u2018organic\u2019 sculpted shape elements. Ideally we can then create CAD geometry from this organic looking mesh shape. ANSYS SpaceClaim has tools available to facilitate doing this.<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-a1\" <\/picture><\/a>Topological optimization has seen a return to prominence in the last couple of years due to advances in additive manufacturing. With additive manufacturing, it has become much easier to make parts with the organic shapes resulting from topological optimization. ANSYS has had topological optimization capability both in Mechanical APDL and Workbench in the past, but the capabilities as well as the applications at the time were limited, so those tools eventually died off. New to the fold are ANSYS ACT Extensions for Topological Optimization in ANSYS Mechanical for versions 17.0, 17.1, and 17.2. These are free to customers with current maintenance and are available on the ANSYS Customer Portal.<\/p>\n

In deciding to write this piece, I decided an interesting example would be the brace that is part of all curved saxophones. This brace connects the bell to the rest of the saxophone body, and provides stiffness and strength to the instrument. Various designs of this brace have been used by different manufacturers over the years. Since saxophone manufacturers like those in other industries are often looking for product differentiation, the use of an optimized organic shape in this structural component could be a nice marketing advantage.<\/p>\n

This article is not intended to be a technical discourse on the principles behind topological optimization, nor is it intended to show expertise in saxophone design. Rather, the intent is to show an example of the kind of work that can be done using topological optimization and will hopefully get the creative juices flowing for lots of ANSYS users who now have access to this capability.<\/p>\n

That being said, here are some images of example bell to body braces in vintage and modern saxophones. Like anything collectible, saxophones have fans of various manufacturers over the years, and horns going back to production as early as the 1920\u2019s are still being used by some players. The older designs tend to have a simple thin brace connecting two pads soldered to the bell and body on each end. Newer designs can include rings with pivot connections between the brace and soldered pads.<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-01\" <\/picture><\/a>
Half Ring Brace<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Solid <\/picture><\/a>
Solid connection to bell, screw joint to body<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"Older <\/picture><\/a>
Older thin but solid brace rigidly connected to soldered pads<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"topo-opt-sax-04\" <\/picture><\/a>
Modern ring design<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"Modern <\/picture><\/a>
Modern Dual Degree of Freedom with Revolute Joint Type Connections<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Hopefully those examples show there can be variation in the design of this brace, while not largely tampering with the musical performance of the saxophone in general. The intent was to pick a saxophone part that could undergo topological optimization which would not significantly alter the musical characteristics of the instrument.<\/p>\n

The first step was to obtain a CAD model of a saxophone body. Since I was not able to easily find one freely available on the internet that looked accurate enough to be useful, I created my own in ANSYS SpaceClaim using some basic measurements of an example instrument. I then modeled a \u2018blob\u2019 of material at the brace location. The idea is that the topological optimization process will remove non-needed material from this blob, leaving an optimized shape after a certain level of volume reduction.<\/p>\n

\"Representative <\/picture><\/a>
Representative Solid Model Geometry Created in ANSYS SpaceClaim. Note \u2018Blob\u2019 of Material at Brace Location.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In ANSYS Mechanical, the applied boundary conditions consisted of frictionless support constraints at the thumb rest locations and a vertical displacement constraint at the attachment point for the neck strap. Acceleration due to gravity was applied as well. Other loads, such as sideways inertial acceleration, could have been considered as well but were ignored for the sake of simplicity for this article. The material property used was brass, with values taken from Shigley and Mitchell\u2019s Mechanical Engineering Design text, 1983 edition.<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-07\" <\/picture><\/a>
Applied Boundary Conditions Were Various Constraints at A, B, and C, as well as Acceleration Due to Gravity.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

This plot shows the resulting displacement distribution due to the gravity load:<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-08\" <\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n

Now that things are looking as I expect, the next step is performing the topological optimization.<\/p>\n

Once the topological optimization ACT Extension has been downloaded from the ANSYS Customer Portal and installed, ANSYS Mechanical will automatically include a Topological Optimization menu:<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-09\" <\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n

I set the Design Region to be the blog of material that I want to end up as the optimized brace. I did a few trials with varying mesh refinement. Obviously, the finer the mesh, the smoother the surface of the optimized shape as elements that are determined to be unnecessary are removed from consideration. The optimization Objective was set to minimize compliance (maximize stiffness). The optimization Constraint was set to volume at 30%, meaning reduce the volume to 30% of the current value of the \u2018blob\u2019.
\nAfter running the solution and plotting Averaged Node Values, we can see the ANSYS-determined optimized shape:<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-10\" <\/picture><\/a>
Two views of the optimized shape.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

What is apparent when looking at these shapes is that the \u2018solder patch\u2019 where the brace attaches to the bell on one end and the body on the other end was allowed to be reduced. For example, in the left image we can see that a hole has been \u2018drilled\u2019 through the patch that would connect the brace to the body. On the other end, the patch has been split through the middle, making it look something like an alligator clip.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Another optimization run was performed in which the solder pads were held as surfaces that were not to be changed by the optimization. The resulting optimized shape is shown here:<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-11\" <\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n

Noticing that my optimized shape seemed on the thick side when compared to production braces, I then changed the \u2018blob\u2019 in ANSYS SpaceClaim so that it was thinner to start with. With ANSYS it\u2019s very easy to propagate geometry changes as all of the simulation and topological optimizations settings stay tied to the geometry as long as the topology of those items stays the same.<\/p>\n

Here is the thinner chunk after making a simple change in ANSYS SpacClaim:<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-12\" <\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n

And here is the result of the topological optimization using the thinner blob as the starting point:<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-13\" <\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n

Using the ANSYS SpaceClaim Direct Modeler, the faceted STL file that results from the ANSYS topological optimization can be converted into a geometry file. This can be done in a variety of ways, including a \u2018shrink wrap\u2019 onto the faceted geometry as well as surfaces fit onto the facets. Another option is to fit geometry in a more general way in an around the faceted result. These methods can also be combined. SpaceClaim is really a great tool for this. Using SpaceClaim and the topological optimization (faceted) result, I came up with three different \u2018looks\u2019 of the optimized part.<\/p>\n

Using ANSYS Workbench, it\u2019s very easy to plug the new geometry component into the simulation model that I already had setup and run in ANSYS Mechanical using the \u2018blob\u2019 as the brace in the original model. I then checked the displacement and stress results to see how they compared.<\/p>\n

First, we have an organic looking shape that is mostly faithful to the results from the topological optimization run. This image is from ANSYS SpaceClaim, after a few minutes of \u2018digital filing and sanding\u2019 work on the STL faceted geometry output from ANSYS Mechanical.<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-14\" <\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n

This shows the resulting deflection from this first, \u2018organic\u2019 candidate:<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-15\" <\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n

The next candidate is one where more traditional looking solid geometry was created in SpaceClaim, using the topological optimization result as a guide. This is what it looks like:<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-16\" <\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n

This is the same configuration, but showing it in place within the saxophone bell and body model in ANSYS SpaceClaim:<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-17\" <\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n

Next, here is the deformation result for our simple loading condition using this second geometry configuration:<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-18\" <\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n

The third and final design candidate uses the second set of geometry as a starting point, and then adds a bit of style while still maintaining the topological optimization shape as an overall guide. Here is this third candidate in ANSYS SpaceClaim:<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-19\" <\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n

Here are is the resulting displacement distribution using this design:<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-20\" <\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n

This shows the maximum principal stress distribution within the brace for this candidate:<\/p>\n

\"topo-opt-sax-21\" <\/picture><\/a><\/p>\n

Again, I want to emphasize that this was a simple example and there are other considerations that could have been included, such as loading conditions other than acceleration due to gravity. Also, while it\u2019s simple to include modal analysis results, in the interest of brevity I have not included them here. The main point is that topological optimization is a tool available within ANSYS Mechanical using the ACT extension that\u2019s available for download on the customer portal. This is yet another tool available to us within our ANSYS simulation suite. It is my hope that you will also explore what can be done with this tool.<\/p>\n

Regarding this effort, clearly a next step would be to 3D print one or more of these designs and test it out for real. Time permitting, we\u2019ll give that a try at some point in the future.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

What is Topological Optimization? If you\u2019re not familiar with the concept, in finite element terms it means performing a shape […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":29379,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2323],"tags":[540,478,511,1454,1455,1062,1456,1457,1063],"post-podcast":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.padtinc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29378"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.padtinc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.padtinc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.padtinc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.padtinc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29378"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.padtinc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29378\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.padtinc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29379"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.padtinc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29378"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.padtinc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29378"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.padtinc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29378"},{"taxonomy":"post-podcast","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.padtinc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post-podcast?post=29378"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}